Scientific Opinion on Rift Valley fever

Tabs

Article
Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal 2013;11(4):3180 [48 pp.].
doi
10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3180
Panel members at the time of adoption
Edith Authie, Charlotte Berg, Anette Bøtner, Howard Browman, Ilaria Capua, Aline De Koeijer, Klaus Depner, Mariano Domingo, Sandra Edwards, Christine Fourichon, Frank Koenen, Simon More, Mohan Raj, Liisa Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Ivar Vågsholm, Antonio Velarde, Preben Willeberg and Stéphan Zientara.
Acknowledgements

The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Rift Valley Fever: Thierry Baldet Anette Bøtner, Veronique Chevalier, Ouafaa Fassi Fihri, Egil Fisher, Eyal Klement, Ludovic Plee, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke and the hearing experts: Anthony Gene O’Hagan Rowe. EFSA staff: Sofie Dhollander, Frank Verdonck, Francesca Riolo and Tilemachos Goumperis for the support provided to this scientific opinion.

Contact
Type
Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
On request from
European Commission
Question Number
EFSA-Q-2012-00679
Adopted
23 marzo 2013
Published in the EFSA Journal
26 aprile 2013
Affiliation
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
Note
Abstract

Based on a comprehensive review of literature and OIE (World Animal Health Organisation) outbreak reports, this scientific opinion reports, first, that there is no evidence that Rift Valley fever (RVF) has spread to previously uninfected countries during the past 10 years. Nevertheless, RVF has moved north within Mauritania, in a desert area. Secondly, maps of Europe and the southern Mediterranean Basin are provided, displaying the geographic distribution of the reported presence of nine potentially competent Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) vectors of the region, based on a systematic literature review. From environmental and eco-climatic data, predicted presence maps were generated that suggest the suitability of several parts of Europe and the southern Mediterranean Basin for these potentially competent RVFV vectors. Thirdly, to assess the risk of introduction of RVFV into some designated countries in the southern Mediterranean Basin (hereafter defined as the region concerned, RC), especially through the movements of live animals and vectors, a quantitative model was constructed and model parameters were derived based on expert knowledge elicitation (EKE). The EKE model indicates that some hundreds of RVFV-infected animals will be moved into the RC when an epidemic in the source areas occurs. The risk of RVFV entering the RC through the movement of vectors is expected to be small in comparison with the risk of entry through infected animals. Because of a lack of quantitative information on the seasonality of vector abundance and vertical transmission of RVFV within local vector species, the risk of endemicity could not be assessed. However, based on the abundance of the vector Culex pipiens, the livestock densities and the temperature in the region, there is a potential for the occurrence of RVF spread in the coastal areas of the RC.

Keywords
Rift Valley fever, Mediterranean Basin, vectors, distribution, risk assessment, introduction, endemicity
Print on demand
Number of Pages
48