Managing evidence in food safety and nutrition

data, evidence integration, evidence management, food safety
First published in the EFSA Journal
8 July 2019
Approved
29 May 2019
Type
Special Issue

The views or positions expressed in this article do not necessarily represent in legal terms the official position of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) nor of the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). EFSA assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear. This article does not disclose any confidential information or data. Mention of proprietary products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not constitute an endorsement or a recommendation by EFSA for their use.

Abstract

Evidence (‘data’) is at the heart of EFSA's 2020 Strategy and is addressed in three of its operational objectives: (1) adopt an open data approach, (2) improve data interoperability to facilitate data exchange, and (3) migrate towards structured scientific data. As the generation and availability of data have increased exponentially in the last decade, potentially providing a much larger evidence base for risk assessments, it is envisaged that the acquisition and management of evidence to support future food safety risk assessments will be a dominant feature of EFSA's future strategy. During the breakout session on ‘Managing evidence’ of EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food, Society’, current challenges and future developments were discussed in evidence management applied to food safety risk assessment, accounting for the increased volume of evidence available as well as the increased IT capabilities to access and analyse it. This paper reports on presentations given and discussions held during the session, which were centred around the following three main topics: (1) (big) data availability and (big) data connection, (2) problem formulation and (3) evidence integration.

Contact
Ermanno.Cavalli [at] efsa.europa.eu
doi
10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170704
EFSA Journal 2019;17(S1):e170704