Special Issue Item
Journal Editorial
Scientific opinions of Scientific/Scientific Panel
Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
Statement of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
Guidance of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
Statement of EFSA
Guidance of EFSA
Conclusion on pesticides
Reasoned opinion on pesticide
Scientific report of EFSA
Technical Report
Animal health & welfare
Biological hazards
Biological monitoring
Contaminants
Dietary & chemical monitoring
Emerging risks
Feed
GMO
Nutrition
Pesticides
Plant health
Scientific assessment support
Scientific Committee
Scientific cooperation
Relevance
Further Advice on the Implications of Animal Cloning (SCNT)
The European Food Safety Authority wishes to thank Andras DinnyƩs, Louis-Marie
Houdebine, Heiner Niemann, David Morton and Jean-Paul Renard for peer-reviewing the
statement.
No abstract available
The European Food Safety Authority received in March 2009 a request from the European Commission to expand and further deepen the underlying details related to the recommendations included in the animal cloning opinion of July 2008 (EFSA Journal (2008) 747, 1-49). The request was for EFSA to focus in particular on the health and welfare of animal clones and the recommendations related to investigation of the causes of pathologies and mortality observed in clones during the gestational and postnatal periods and those observed at a lower frequency in adulthood and the health and welfare of clones during their productive life and natural life span. In addition the European Commission requested to know to what extent the current knowledge applies to cloning of sheep, goats and chicken.
A number of scientific publications have been published since the EFSA 2008 opinion indicating that Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) is an active field both regarding basic and applied research. Most publications have studied embryonic or early development or methodological developments and there are only a few publications and studies on postnatal or adult animals. If the success rate of the epigenetic reprogramming is improved it is likely that the pathologies and mortalities observed in a proportion of clones would decrease.
There is still not sufficient data on species other than cattle and pigs to perform a risk assessment.
This statement confirms that the conclusions and recommendations of the EFSA 2008 opinion are still valid.
