Use of animal-based measures to assess animal welfare


Animal welfare, animal-based measures, welfare outcome indicators, risk assessment, welfare assessment
First published in the EFSA Journal
14 June 2012
23 May 2012

The overall aim of the work outlined in this statement is to help establish a common framework for future scientific opinions dealing with the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. The statement is mainly intended to support the work of EFSA, and a list of considerations for experts working on these future scientific opinions is presented. EFSA has already published a scientific opinion on dairy cattle and another on pigs related to the topic. This statement clarifies some common issues on terminology and integration of concepts, and presents some essential characteristics of animal-based measures to ensure that they are ‘fit for purpose’. It highlights that more information is needed about the direction and strength of the various links between input factors and the animal-based measures (welfare indicators) that are used to assess their consequences. The statement highlights the importance of the systematic collection of standardised field data on animal-based measures and subsequent availability in well-defined databases. Targeted analysis of such data will help when selecting the most appropriate measure, or combination of measures, from the ‘toolbox’ of many potential measures, according to the specific purpose of the welfare assessment, as well as contribute to better assessing their validity and robustness. This will support the move towards quantitative risk assessment of animal welfare.

Panel members at the time of adoption
Anette Bøtner, Donald Broom, Marcus G. Doherr, Mariano Domingo, Jörg Hartung, Linda Keeling, Frank Koenen, Simon More, David Morton, Pascal Oltenacu, Fulvio Salati, Mo Salman, Moez Sanaa, James M. Sharp, Jan A. Stegeman, Endre Szücs, Hans-H. Thulke, Philippe Vannier, John Webster and Martin Wierup
Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
ahaw [at] efsa.europa
EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2767 [29 pp.].
Question Number
On request from
Print on demand
Number of Pages