Scientific opinion on the safety of smoke flavouring Primary Product AM 01 – 2012 Update

Tabs

Article
Acknowledgements

The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Flavourings: Ulla Beckman Sundh, Leon Brimer, Wilfried Bursch, Angelo Carere, Karl-Heinz Engel, Henrik Frandsen, Rainer Gürtler, Frances Hill, Trine Husøy, Catherine Leclercq, Wim Mennes, Gerard Mulder, Gerrit Speijers and Harriet Wallin for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion and EFSA staff: Davide Arcella, Anna F. Castoldi, Andrea Terron and Anne Theobald for the support provided to this scientific opinion.

Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2580 [18 pp.].
doi
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2580
Panel members at the time of adoption
Iona Pratt, Ulla Beckman Sundh, Mona-Lise Binderup, Leon Brimer, Laurence Castle, Karl-Heinz Engel, Roland Franz, Nathalie Gontard, Trine Husøy, Rainer Gürtler, Klaus-Dieter Jany, Catherine Leclercq, Jean-Claude Lhuguenot, Wim C. Mennes, Maria Rosaria Milana, Kettil Svensson, Fidel Toldrá, Detlef Wölfle
Contact
Type
Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
On request from
European Commission
Question Number
EFSA-Q-2011-01019
Adopted
2 February 2012
Published
22 February 2012
Last Updated
7 March 2012. This version replaces the previous one/s.
Affiliation
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
Note
Abstract

The EFSA CEF Panel updated the safety assessment of the smoke flavouring Primary Product AM 01. After the opinion of 2010 the Panel received new data i.e. new use levels, chemical data and a new in vivo Comet assay. In 2010, the Panel concluded that the genotoxic potential of this Primary Product could not be ruled out given the limitations in the data set. Also the margins of safety for this Primary Product were considered insufficient and the proposed use levels were considered of safety concern.

In the new in vivo Comet assay the Primary Product did not induce statistically significant increases in DNA strand breaks at any of the tested doses in the liver or in the duodenum cells. The Panel concluded that based on the available data there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity for the Primary Product.

The chemical data provided demonstrate that the material tested in the Comet assay is representative of the Primary Product evaluated by EFSA in 2010. No additional data were provided in order to mitigate the issue associated with the large degree of batch-to-batch variability and chemical stability during shelf life described for the Primary Product in the opinion of 2010.

Based on newly submitted use levels, the margins of safety are 104-114 (total dietary exposure) and 109-179 (use in traditionally smoke foods only) depending on the exposure scenario used. Given that these margins of safety are based on a 90-day toxicity study, and given the absence of data on reproduction, developmental toxicity and of long term studies, it is concluded that the uses and use levels of Primary Product would require a larger margin of safety. The Panel concluded that the proposed use of the Primary Product at the uses and use levels specified is of safety concern.

Keywords
Smoke flavouring, Primary Product, AM 01
Print on demand
Number of Pages
18