MOE approach for the assessment of impurities which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic

Tabs

Article
Margin of exposure, genotoxic, carcinogenic, impurities, additives, flavourings
First published in the EFSA Journal
30 March 2012
Adopted
8 February 2012
Type
Statement
Abstract

Following a request from EFSA, the Scientific Committee was asked to deliver a statement on the applicability of the margin of exposure approach for the safety assessment of impurities which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic in substances added to food or feed. The Scientific Committee acknowledges that analytical methodology is continually improving, and an increasing number of impurities, including some substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic, can be detected at low levels in, for example, food/feed additives or food contact materials. As a result it can be foreseen that these impurities may end up in food, including products from animal origin.

The Scientific Committee is of the opinion that the MOE approach can be applied to impurities which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic, irrespective of their origin. The Scientific Committee reiterates its view expressed in 2005 that in general a margin of exposure of 10,000 or higher, if it is based on the BMDL10 from an animal study, and taking into account overall uncertainties in the interpretation, would be of low concern from a public health point of view; the magnitude of an MOE however only indicates a level of concern and does not quantify risk.

When using the MOE approach for assessing impurities, the derivation of the MOE, its magnitude, and the uncertainties regarding its derivation should be described. A conclusion on whether the MOE is of high concern, low concern, or unlikely to be of safety concern should also be provided.

The Scientific Committee reiterates its recommendation that follow-up discussion should be organised with EFSA partners on the weighing of the potential health significance of the magnitude of particular MOEs and how to band MOEs with respect to conclusions that use expressions such as high concern, low concern, or unlikely to be of safety concern.

Panel members at the time of adoption
Boris Antunović, Sue Barlow, Andrew Chesson, Albert Flynn, Anthony Hardy, Michael Jeger, Ada Knaap, Harry Kuiper, David Lovell, Birgit Nørrung, Iona Pratt, Ivonne Rietjens, Josef Schlatter, Vittorio Silano, Frans Smulders and Philippe Vannier
Contact
scientific.committee [at] efsa.europa.eu
doi
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2578
EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2578 [5 pp.].
Question Number
On request from
EFSA
Print on demand
Number of Pages
5