Scientific Opinion on the safety evaluation of the substance, dioctadecyl disulphide, CAS No 2500-88-1, for use in food contact materials

Tabs

Article
Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal 2011;9(10):2401 [9 pp.].
doi
10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2401
Panel members at the time of adoption
Arturo Anadón, Mona-Lise Binderup, Wilfried Bursch, Laurence Castle, Riccardo Crebelli, Karl-Heinz Engel, Roland Franz, Nathalie Gontard, Thomas Haertlé, Trine Husøy, Klaus-Dieter Jany, Catherine Leclercq, Jean-Claude Lhuguenot, Wim Mennes, Maria Rosaria Milana, Karla Pfaff, Kettil Svensson, Fidel Toldrá, Rosemary Waring, Detlef Wölfle
Acknowledgements

The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Food Contact Materials for the preparation of this opinion: Mona-Lise Binderup, Laurence Castle, Riccardo Crebelli, Roland Franz, Nathalie Gontard, Eugenia Lampi, Jean-Claude Lhuguenot, Maria Rosaria Milana, Karla Pfaff, Kettil Svensson and Detlef Wölfle for the support provided to this EFSA scientific output.

Possible conflict of interest
One member of the Panel, D. Wölfle, declared an interest as he prepared the summary of the toxicological data on the substance under contract of his Institute BfR with EFSA. This was considered as a conflict of interest because he could not act at the same time as a representative of the contractor and a member of the Panel with voting rights. He was allowed to stay in the room to answer questions specifically addressed to him but did not participate in the discussion of the opinion.
Type
Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
On request from
DG SANCO, Brussels
Question Number
EFSA-Q-2011-00079
Adopted
29 September 2011
Published
12 October 2011
Affiliation
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
Note
Download Article (72.93 KB)
Abstract

This scientific opinion of EFSA deals with the safety assessment of the additive dioctadecyl disulphide, CAS No 2500-88-1, REF. No 49840; FCM substance No 449 for which the CEF Panel concluded that a limited daily intake of the substance up to 0.05 mg/person is unlikely to be a safety concern.

Summary

The EFSA was requested by the European Commission to assess the safety in use of the substance dioctadecyl disulphide and if the established specific migration limit (SML) of 3 mg/kg food is still valid on the basis of new information provided by industry.

The substance is used as an additive in plastics intended to come in contact with food and it was authorised in 2001 following an opinion by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) published in 1995. In that opinion a TDI of 0.05 mg/kg bw was allocated to the substance based on the results of a 90-day oral rat study of 1969 submitted by the industry. The Commission allocated an SML of 3 mg/kg food on the assumption that a person, weighing 60 kg, may consume daily up to 1 kg of food in contact with a food contact material containing the substance.

In 2010 the industry submitted new toxicological studies to the Commission with the question to be examined if the substance is accumulated in man.

The Commission asked the EFSA to review the information provided and advise on whether it raises issues regarding the safe use of the substance and to assess if the SML of 3 mg/kg food is still appropriate.

Data from two toxicokinetic studies in male rats suggest that dioctadecyl disulphide is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract.

The CEF Panel considers that there is no concern regarding the genotoxicity of dioctadecyl disulphide based on negative findings in five in vitro genotoxicity assays and one in vivo micronucleus assay.

Two 90-day toxicity studies in which dioctadecyl disulphide was administered orally to rats and beagle dogs could not be used for the derivation of a NOAEL/LOAEL due to the limited data reporting (rat study) and inadequate study design (dog study).

In two chronic studies deposits of dioctadecyl disulphide were observed in several organs (e.g. liver, adrenals, lymph nodes) in rats and dogs, together with treatment-related evidence of toxicity. An inverse dose:response relationship was however seen for both deposition of test material and organ changes evidencing toxicity . The Panel considered that due to absence of a positive dose-relationship for the observed effects and the presence of possible treatment-related effects at the lowest dose tested, the results of the study could not be used for the purposes of risk assessment of dioctadecyl disulphide.

In a reproduction/developmental toxicity study the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was at the highest administered dose (approximately 1200 mg/kg bw/day).

The CEF Panel concluded that dioctadecyl disulphide is very poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, but is taken up to some extent as evidenced by the finding of insoluble test material in various organs in chronic studies in two species. The substance therefore has a potential for accumulation, and to result in toxicity. Due to uncertainties related to the dose-response relationship and the presence of possible treatment-related effects at the lowest dose tested in two species, the Panel could not derive a NOAEL for dioctadecyl disulphide from the available in vivo studies.

Therefore the CEF Panel does not concur with the TDI of 0.05 mg/kg/bw for dioctadecyl disulphide allocated by the SCF in 1995 and with the SML of 3 mg/kg food based on this TDI. However, considering the absence of genotoxicity, a limited daily intake of the substance up to 0.05 mg/person is unlikely to be a safety concern.

Keywords
α-Dimethyl-3-(4'-hydroxy-3'-methoxyphenyl)propylsilyloxy,ω-3-dimethyl-3-(4'-hydroxy-3'-methoxyphenyl)propylsilyl polydimethylsiloxane, n=26-50; CAS number 156065-00-8; Ref. No. 16265; FCM substance No. 874; Eugenol, Food contact materials; Safety assessm
Print on demand
Number of Pages
9