Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of using recycled hot water as a decontamination technique for meat carcasses


Panel on Biological Hazards
Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal 2010;8(9):1827 [69 pp.].
Panel members at the time of adoption
Olivier Andreoletti, Herbert Budka, Sava Buncic, John D. Collins, John Griffin, Arie Havelaar, James Hope, Günter Klein, Tine Hald, James McLauchlin, Christine Mueller-Graf, Christophe Nguyen-The, Birgit Noerrung, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Luisa Peixe, Antonia Ricci, John Sofos, John Threlfall, Ivar Vågsholm and Emmanuel Vanopdenbosch.

The Panels wish to thank the members of the Working Group on the safety and efficacy of using recycled hot water as a decontamination technique for meat carcasses for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion: Sava Buncic, Birgit Noerrung, Christian James, John Sofos, Kostas Koutsoumanis, Johanna Fink-Gremmels, Emmanuel Vanopdenbosch and EFSA’s staff members Alessandro Broglia and Marc Vandenbroeck for the support provided to this EFSA scientific output.

Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
On request from
European Commission
Question Number
22 September 2010
Published in the EFSA Journal
30 September 2010
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

For carcass decontamination purposes, only use of potable water is currently allowed in the EU. However, recycling (i.e. reusing after reheating) of the water used for carcass decontamination has been practiced in some countries (e.g. Canada, Denmark), because environmental and energy-preserving reasons. In this document, potential microbiological and abiotic risks for carcasses associated with recycled hot water decontamination, and related control options, were considered. It has been concluded that the decontamination efficacy of recycled hot water does not differ significantly from that of hot potable water. With recycled hot water, only microbiological risks associated with heat-resistant bacterial spores (C. botulinum, C. perfringens, C. difficile and B. cereus) are relevant. These risks can be controlled through ensuring that recycled hot water is verifiably subjected to such reheating and frequency of renewal regimes which ensure that the microbiological risk in recycled water is not higher than in hot potable water. For abiotic risks, the only concern with recycled hot water derives from the potential presence and accumulation of residues of veterinary drugs and other chemical contaminants not addressed in Council Directive 98/83/EC in the water for decontamination of poultry carcasses.

Contaminants, decontamination, HACCP, recycled hot water, spores, veterinary medicinal products
Print on demand
Number of Pages