Scientific Opinion on Lime Treatment of Solid Pig and Poultry Manure

EFSA Journal 2010; 8(7):1681 [16 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1681
  EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards Panel Members Olivier Andreoletti, Herbert Budka, Sava Buncic, John D Collins, John Griffin, Tine Hald, Arie Hendrik Havelaar, James Hope, Günter Klein, James McLauchlin, Winy Messens, Christine Müller-Graf, Christophe Nguyen-The, Birgit Noerrung, Luisa Peixe, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Antonia Ricci, John Sofos, John Threlfall, Ivar Vågsholm, Emmanuel Vanopdenbosch. Acknowledgment the Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group for the preparatory work for opinion: Christophe Nguyen-thé, Reinhard Böhm and Robert Somerville Contact biohaz@efsa.europa.eu
Type: Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel On request from: European Commission Question number: EFSA-Q-2005-062 Adopted: 08 July 2010 Published: 28 July 2010 Affiliation: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
Abstract

EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on a novel process submitted by a European association as a safe means of disposal of Animal By-Products (ABP) according to Regulation (EC) 1774/2002 . The application received describes a lime treatment process for dewatered pig and solid poultry manure which could be operated at two different temperatures (60°C and 70°C). The applicant carried out full scale trials for a batch process (i.e. stockpiles) utilizing quick lime (CaO) and demonstrated that the proposed process inactivated the relevant bacterial pathogens (Salmonella) and indicator (Enterococcus faecalis) by more than 5 log10 and the relevant virus and parasite eggs by more than 3 log10. The Panel concluded that the information provided by the applicant is sufficient to show that the mixing of dewatered pig and solid poultry manure with quicklime at the requested exposure time of 30 or 60 minutes, respectively for treatment at 70°C and 60°C at pH 12 meets the requirements for Agent Risk Reduction. However, it was highlighted that the assessment provided cannot be extended to different equipments, different types of manure and different incubation conditions than those used in the experimental validation. Moreover, the applicant did not give sufficient information to ascertain that in practice the target temperatures and pH are achieved in all part of the stockpile for the sufficient time period. The BIOHAZ Panel recommended that the proposed processes can be considered able to safely process dewatered pig and solid poultry manure only if certain given conditions are met.

© European Food Safety Authority, 2010

Summary

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Biological Hazards was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on Lime Treatment of Solid Pig and Poultry Manure.

Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption[1] , divides Animal By-Products (ABP) into three different Categories and requires them to be disposed of, recycled or used. The Regulation also provides for the possibility to approve other means of disposal and other ways to use ABP after consultation of the appropriate scientific committee (Articles 4(2)(e), 5(2)(g) and 6(2)(i)).

A European association submitted a novel process and asked the European Commission to approve it as a safe means of disposal under Article 5 (2) (g) of Regulation 1774/2002/EC, i.e. as far as Category 2 material are concerned.

The European Commission asked EFSA to i) assess the ability of the process submitted to safely dispose of Category 2 animal by-products and ii) in case the process is considered to present a risk, to advice on the risks of the use of that process and on possibilities for addressing them. After an information exchange with the applicant it was clarified that the terms of reference of the mandate were focused only on pig and poultry solid manure treatment and that the solid pig manure consisted of dewatered manure.

The application received describes a lime treatment process for dewatered pig and solid poultry manure which could be operated at two different temperatures (60°C and 70°C). The applicant carried out full scale trials in Belgium utilizing quick lime (CaO). The samples to demonstrate pathogen reduction were tested by the University of Leipzig. The applicant proposes to utilize the two possible treatments to process dewatered pig and solid poultry manure by a batch procedure for covered or uncovered stockpiles and for containers. However, only uncovered stockpiles were used in the experimental protocol to validate the pathogen reduction.

Since the experiments presented by the applicant concerned only dewatered pig and solid poultry manure, the BIOHAZ Panel assessed these treatments only for these kinds of manure and not for all types of Cat. 2 ABP.

The BIOHAZ Panel assessed the application received following the scheme proposed in the “Guidelines for applications for new alternative methods of disposal or use
of animal by-products” prepared jointly by the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (DG-SANCO) and EFSA[2] .

The Panel concluded that the information provided by the applicant is sufficient to show that the mixing of dewatered pig and solid poultry manure with quicklime at the requested exposure time of 30 or 60 minutes, respectively for treatment at 70°C and 60°C at pH 12 meets the requirements for Agent Risk Reduction according to the EFSA 2005 opinion vis-à-vis biological risks of biogas and compost treatment standards of animal by-products[3] . However, the applicant did not give sufficient information to ascertain that in practice the target temperatures and pH are achieved in all part of the stockpile for the sufficient time period.

It was highlighted that this assessment cannot be extended to different equipments, different types of manure and different incubation conditions (i.e. continuous process) than those used in the experimental validation.

The BIOHAZ Panel recommended that the proposed processes can be considered able to safely process dewatered pig and solid poultry manure only if certain given conditions are met. In case another mixing device than the one used in the validation is proposed it is recommended to assess its equivalence by a simplified validation procedure based on temperature measurements at representative measuring points in the stockpile. An example of simplified validation procedure was provided in the Appendix of the opinion. In case other types of manure, methods other than stockpiles (i.e. continuous processes or containers) are proposed it was recommended to perform a full validation experiment.

Keywords

Manure, Lime, Animal By-Products, Alternative Methods